Respond to the NIH's Request for Information

On May 24th, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released the document Request for Information: Soliciting Input for New Research Strategies for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS).  An RFI, or Request for Information is “critical for identification and consideration of research areas and topics to be included in future efforts.”  The Trans-NIH ME/CFS Working Group will review the comments about ME/CFS research that they receive from the public and potentially use this information to direct current and future research.
#MEAction is currently formulating our response as an organization, along with a mechanism for soliciting and incorporating community input.
The Trans-NIH ME/CFS Working Group is soliciting the following information from “researchers, health care providers, patient advocates, and health advocacy organizations, scientific or professional organizations, Federal agencies, and other interested parties”:

  • Emerging needs and opportunities in ME/CFS Research, including
    • A description of the need or opportunity
    • A scientific rationale and potential health impact
    • Any anticipated challenges that may arise
    • Appropriate benchmarks for evaluating progress
  • Challenges or barriers to ME/CFS research
  • Gaps and opportunities in research

The NIBIB is particularly interested in new imaging and bioengineering technologies that may have bearing on ME/CFS research.

  • Must be submitted through Friday, June 24, 2016
  • May be submitted by individuals as well as organizations; organizations are encouraged to submit a consensus document as well
  • May be submitted anonymously; however, submissions should not include any information the author considers private
  • Must be submitted to [email protected]

The RFI document stresses that the government is in no way required to acknowledge receipt of responses, nor to provide any feedback.
For more information on the RFI, view the original document here.


3 thoughts on “Respond to the NIH's Request for Information”

  1. Huge need for quantifying the exercise protocols that mark VaneNess and Staci Stevens are using. Heart rate monitoring and heart rate variability data is helping patients. It’s something that can be implemented immediately while we wait for a cure.
    Needs recognition that the profoundly ill may need to focus on staying still, absolutely still, too keep their heart rate under the heart rate cap. There are people too ill to move.
    [Edited for language]

  2. I think we need to dump exercise. DUMP IT! It is NOT working for ANY patients as a T-R-E-A-T-M-E-N-T. All that happens is patients that happen to be in remission can exercise carefully which happened to me for over 20 years.
    Just tell them to never get their heart rate up even while in remission or remitting. Exercise is to keep muscle tone, weight down and other health needs but it is NOT FOR ME/CFS.
    I think we need to stress there IS relapsing/remitting, remission, very few recoveries, some patients can improve but never really well and will always be in danger of relapsing.
    And that there are those that can work if they are careful with the type of job they have and have family that works with them with housework and vacations are restful. Some can work only part time and have to let go of most of their social life and almost all housework or they can keep up with the housework if they do not work. Others are or all but housebound, wheelchair or bedbound. And I do believe we have ME/CFS sufferers from all levels out of the Incline Village Outbreak with even a few full recoveries. It probably matters where the virus hit in their body systems and what Neuro-immune, Neurological, Auto-immune and body systems it took out in each patient and there is always the danger of getting worse over the years and they often do.

  3. Can research include a group with no intervention? I think some
    recovery happens naturally, then gets accredited to whatever treatment
    is happening at the time.
    I made three recoveries over 15 years from being severely affected to being
    able to work full time. I began unable to do anything but rest and
    started again when I felt well enough.
    On the fourth try, I had pushed too long to keep working, rested
    then tried to recover through gentle exercise. I had a relapse I
    didn’t recover from and am now severely affected.

Comments are closed.

Latest News

a multi-water colored image with the words, Severe ME Artists Project 2024 in white font outlined in black. the meaction action logo in the bottom right hand corner.

Severe ME Artists Project 2024

Quick Overview: Submit one piece of artwork – image, writing, or video Label your artwork with your name as you want it to appear, an underscore, and the number of years with severe ME Example: Lastname_FirstName_14 FirstNameOnly_ No copyrighted material If you are submitting a video, it must be under two minutes. Submission due by

Read More »
Light blue square with rainbows in the top left and bottom right corner. In the middle are the words, -Pride is Valid- No Matter How One Celebrates or Experiences It. #MEAction Board Member, Jennifer England, shares her views on Pride. The #MEAction logo in the top right corner.

Pride Is Valid No Matter How One Celebrates or Experiences It

In honor of Pride Month, #MEAction is sharing a heartfelt message from our board member, Jennifer England, about what Pride means to her and her wife who lives with severe ME. My wife and I have both been queer our whole lives, but in the 70s that was the quiet part you didn’t say out

Read More »

Questions to Ask Prospective MPs About ME/CFS

In the next few weeks, candidates will be knocking on doors seeking votes for the upcoming UK Election. It’s important that candidates from all parties are made aware of the challenges facing people with ME and Long Covid. It can be a little daunting to be unprepared so here are some questions you might want

Read More »
Scroll to Top