US: Family testifies about CDC's harmful recommendations at CFSAC

A member of the Shaw family reads their testimony during the comment period at the January CFSAC meeting:

Good afternoon. I have had untreated ME/CFS for 38 years. Our testimony today is on the topic of the Center for Diseases Control’s (CDC) CFS group.

  • The 2015 National Academy of Medicine report characterizes post-exertional malaise, or PEM, as a core symptom of ME/CFS, and stated that exertion of any sort can adversely affect ME/CFS patients in many organ systems…”
  • Last year the PACE Trial authors’ falsified results were exposed as fraudulent.
  • And, the July 2016 AHRQ Addendum stated the following:
    • The Oxford case definition should no longer be used, and,
    • There is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of CBT and GET

But even today, CDC still refuses to remove recommendations for CBT, GET and anything based on the Oxford Criteria from its website.

Number 1:

In June of 2016, our family submitted a simple question on’s Contact page. It was,

“On which exact published and peer-reviewed literature that cites objective, not subjective evidence, does CDC base its published recommendations to use graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for people with ME/CFS? Please provide a list that includes each paper.”

As of today, nearly six months later, after multiple emails to CDC by my family and others, and after a teleconference last August with Doctors Unger and McQuiston, CDC has chosen not to provide this list to any of us in the ME/CFS community. [Dr. Jennifer McQuiston is the deputy director of the Division of High-Consequence Pathogens at CDC. Dr. Elizabeth Unger is the Chronic Viral Diseases Branch Chief and oversees ME/CFS at CDC.]

Ours was a simple question.

Dr. Unger:  In an effort to bring CDC’s prolonged avoidance of providing this information into the light of day, we call on you to provide this list to the ME/CFS Community no later than Thursday, January 26.  Requests made to you outside of the public spotlight have yielded no results so we now press you in this public forum.   

CDC insists that its recommendations for CBT and GET are based on available literature, but then refuses to identify the literature on which its recommendations are based.

Number 2: 

In her December 2016 letter to the ME/CFS Community referencing CDC’s CFS web content promoting physical activity, Dr. Unger stated, “…limitations and cautions are included.

  • Unfortunately, this is a significant distortion of the truth. CDC has not published even one specific or actionable method by which clinicians can help protect people with ME/CFS – or by which patients can protect themselves – from over-exertion and harm while engaging in physical activity so strongly recommended by CDC. Remember, there are fewer than a dozen expert ME/CFS clinicians in all of the United States to help care for up to 2.5 million people with this disease.
  • The CDC website states, “Each patient will have to determine their individual limits by trial and error.”  This is medically irresponsible of CDC, to say the least.
  • It must be noted that detailed, actionable information is available from the ME/CFS and exercise physiology experts at the Workwell Foundation – outside CDC.

Number 3:

Last February Dr. Unger herself selected two articles that were posted on CDC’s CFS Science Clips page; each blatantly promotes psychogenic theories about ME/CFS.

Dr. Unger continues to refuse all requests to remove these two factually incorrect, scientifically unsupported, and stigmatizing articles. In last August’s teleconference with Dr. Unger, she insisted that “experts” are experienced and sophisticated enough to distinguish between the articles’ valuable information and their less useful information.

Dr. Unger grossly understates the articles’ outdated and falsely psychologizing information that the ME/CFS community knows to be so harmful to patients. And again, with fewer than 12 ME/CFS expert clinicians in the entire United States, who are the so-called experts to whom Dr. Unger refers?

In her December 2016 letter to the ME/CFS Community, Dr. Unger further claimed that links to these Science Clips articles do not indicate CDC’s endorsement,” a claim that is simply ludicrous. No one visiting the CDC website would ever imagine that CDC’s own web content is not endorsed by CDC, since CDC selects what it posts on its website.  There is no legitimate excuse for not removing these or any scientifically inaccurate, harmful, stigmatizing and outdated articles.

  • Why is CDC not addressing this medical and human rights crisis with urgency?
  • Where is the accurate case definition for ME/CFS?
  • Where is accurate medical education that includes PEM as a core symptom?
  • Where are CDC’s rigorous epidemiological studies on ME/CFS?

We call upon HHS and CDC to stop and reverse the CFS group’s glacial pace, further pursuit and dissemination of scientifically unsupported and harmful work products, and conduct that harms people with ME/CFS, impedes progress and stigmatizes this illness and all who are afflicted with it.

The ME/CFS Community demands the highest levels of integrity, transparency and accountability from CDC’s CFS group.

Thank you.


5 thoughts on “US: Family testifies about CDC's harmful recommendations at CFSAC”

  1. Really great testimony. Thanks to this member of the Shaw family for making these excellent and very necessary in your face comments.

  2. Very cogent testimony and probing questions to the CDC. Thank you to the Shaw family and Adriane for publicizing your advocacy work. Hopefully, it will result in changes on the CDC website soon.

  3. This is an excellent, clear summary. I think we should all send a copy to our congress people and senators with a little personal intro and ask them to please look into this and do something about it. This leads to REAL HARM!

  4. Wow!
    Now where are the lawyers who are prepared to prosecute these fraudulent pseudo-scientists?

Comments are closed.

Latest News

DHSC released a new progress Report

DHSC has released an update on the progress of the work underway to support the development of a Delivery Plan on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue. This is dated from December 2022.You can read the full report using the link below: DHSC Information Bulletin Dec 22 FINAL MECFS updated

Read More »
Gold fireworks lighting up over a black background. The words, TOP HITS 2022 is in the center in white lettering. the words: #MEAction accomplished a lot last year is undernether with the #MEAction logo

Let’s Look at #MEAction’s Top Hits from 2022

As we ring in the new year, it is a wonderful time to reflect on how much #MEAction accomplished in a very busy and exciting 2022! There are so many wins to share, so we decided to narrow down the list to our TOP HITS! ——————- #MILLIONSMISSING 2022: * Bringing together the powerful Virtual #MillionsMissing

Read More »
A photo from Millions Missing Scotland of a group of 20 protestors outside the Scottish Parliament. They’re looking serious and holding signs that say Millions Missing, and a pledge signed by MSPs. Many are wearing red ME Action t-shirts. A yellow icon of a person is overlaid next to them with an arrow pointing to it and the words ‘Could it be your MSP?’ A red banner along the bottom says ‘Share your story and ask your MSPs to stand up for people with ME.’

Ask your MSPs to stand up for people with ME

Sue Webber MSP’s motion about ME will be debated in the Scottish Parliament on Thursday 2nd February – and your MSPs should be there! The motion calls on the Scottish Parliament to recognise the outcomes and recommendations of the stakeholder report on ME, including education of healthcare professionals and development of specialist services. We’re pleased

Read More »

Help keep our work going

We rely on donations from people like you to keep fighting for equality for people with ME.


Get actions alerts and news direct to your inbox

You can choose what you want to be kept up to date on.

Scroll to Top