US: Family testifies about CDC's harmful recommendations at CFSAC

A member of the Shaw family reads their testimony during the comment period at the January CFSAC meeting:

Good afternoon. I have had untreated ME/CFS for 38 years. Our testimony today is on the topic of the Center for Diseases Control’s (CDC) CFS group.

  • The 2015 National Academy of Medicine report characterizes post-exertional malaise, or PEM, as a core symptom of ME/CFS, and stated that exertion of any sort can adversely affect ME/CFS patients in many organ systems…”
  • Last year the PACE Trial authors’ falsified results were exposed as fraudulent.
  • And, the July 2016 AHRQ Addendum stated the following:
    • The Oxford case definition should no longer be used, and,
    • There is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of CBT and GET

But even today, CDC still refuses to remove recommendations for CBT, GET and anything based on the Oxford Criteria from its website.

Number 1:

In June of 2016, our family submitted a simple question on’s Contact page. It was,

“On which exact published and peer-reviewed literature that cites objective, not subjective evidence, does CDC base its published recommendations to use graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for people with ME/CFS? Please provide a list that includes each paper.”

As of today, nearly six months later, after multiple emails to CDC by my family and others, and after a teleconference last August with Doctors Unger and McQuiston, CDC has chosen not to provide this list to any of us in the ME/CFS community. [Dr. Jennifer McQuiston is the deputy director of the Division of High-Consequence Pathogens at CDC. Dr. Elizabeth Unger is the Chronic Viral Diseases Branch Chief and oversees ME/CFS at CDC.]

Ours was a simple question.

Dr. Unger:  In an effort to bring CDC’s prolonged avoidance of providing this information into the light of day, we call on you to provide this list to the ME/CFS Community no later than Thursday, January 26.  Requests made to you outside of the public spotlight have yielded no results so we now press you in this public forum.   

CDC insists that its recommendations for CBT and GET are based on available literature, but then refuses to identify the literature on which its recommendations are based.

Number 2: 

In her December 2016 letter to the ME/CFS Community referencing CDC’s CFS web content promoting physical activity, Dr. Unger stated, “…limitations and cautions are included.

  • Unfortunately, this is a significant distortion of the truth. CDC has not published even one specific or actionable method by which clinicians can help protect people with ME/CFS – or by which patients can protect themselves – from over-exertion and harm while engaging in physical activity so strongly recommended by CDC. Remember, there are fewer than a dozen expert ME/CFS clinicians in all of the United States to help care for up to 2.5 million people with this disease.
  • The CDC website states, “Each patient will have to determine their individual limits by trial and error.”  This is medically irresponsible of CDC, to say the least.
  • It must be noted that detailed, actionable information is available from the ME/CFS and exercise physiology experts at the Workwell Foundation – outside CDC.

Number 3:

Last February Dr. Unger herself selected two articles that were posted on CDC’s CFS Science Clips page; each blatantly promotes psychogenic theories about ME/CFS.

Dr. Unger continues to refuse all requests to remove these two factually incorrect, scientifically unsupported, and stigmatizing articles. In last August’s teleconference with Dr. Unger, she insisted that “experts” are experienced and sophisticated enough to distinguish between the articles’ valuable information and their less useful information.

Dr. Unger grossly understates the articles’ outdated and falsely psychologizing information that the ME/CFS community knows to be so harmful to patients. And again, with fewer than 12 ME/CFS expert clinicians in the entire United States, who are the so-called experts to whom Dr. Unger refers?

In her December 2016 letter to the ME/CFS Community, Dr. Unger further claimed that links to these Science Clips articles do not indicate CDC’s endorsement,” a claim that is simply ludicrous. No one visiting the CDC website would ever imagine that CDC’s own web content is not endorsed by CDC, since CDC selects what it posts on its website.  There is no legitimate excuse for not removing these or any scientifically inaccurate, harmful, stigmatizing and outdated articles.

  • Why is CDC not addressing this medical and human rights crisis with urgency?
  • Where is the accurate case definition for ME/CFS?
  • Where is accurate medical education that includes PEM as a core symptom?
  • Where are CDC’s rigorous epidemiological studies on ME/CFS?

We call upon HHS and CDC to stop and reverse the CFS group’s glacial pace, further pursuit and dissemination of scientifically unsupported and harmful work products, and conduct that harms people with ME/CFS, impedes progress and stigmatizes this illness and all who are afflicted with it.

The ME/CFS Community demands the highest levels of integrity, transparency and accountability from CDC’s CFS group.

Thank you.


5 thoughts on “US: Family testifies about CDC's harmful recommendations at CFSAC”

  1. Really great testimony. Thanks to this member of the Shaw family for making these excellent and very necessary in your face comments.

  2. Very cogent testimony and probing questions to the CDC. Thank you to the Shaw family and Adriane for publicizing your advocacy work. Hopefully, it will result in changes on the CDC website soon.

  3. This is an excellent, clear summary. I think we should all send a copy to our congress people and senators with a little personal intro and ask them to please look into this and do something about it. This leads to REAL HARM!

  4. Wow!
    Now where are the lawyers who are prepared to prosecute these fraudulent pseudo-scientists?

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Graphic of yellow canary over black and white photo of a coal mine. Text reads "Canary Corps"

CANARY CORPS – Alison’s Story

Have you registered yet to join us this Wednesday, December 6th at 4pm ET / 1pm PT for a community presentation introducing the Canary Corps program? Ahead of Wednesday’s event we wanted to share with you Alison’s story. Alison Sbrana will be co-presenting this event, and much of the design of Canary Corps has been

Read More »
A rectangle image with a blueish/purple background. The words, "A Year of Exciting Medical Education Achievements" is in white font on the left hand side with the #MEAction logo underneath. On the righthand side is an image of Jaime Seltzer with a step and repeat and poster at the SDMI conference.

A Year of Exciting Medical Education Achievements

A year ago, we were proud to announce that #MEAction and Mayo Clinic Rochester had won a grant for diagnostic improvement, with Ravindra Ganesh, and Stephanie Grach, and I on the grant as co-investigators. Our project, Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Through Implementation of an Enhanced Education Protocol and Care Process Model

Read More »
a light orange rectangle with a burnt orange outline. in the box, there are orange flag garlands hanging in both top corners with orange confetti in the middle and at the top. in the bottom corners fall leaves. in the middle of the box the word, "OUR BOLDEST THANKS" in burnt orange. the #MEAction logo at the bottom.

#MEAction Shares Our Thanks for Your BOLD ACTIONS

During this time of thankfulness and gratitude, #MEAction staff wants to share what BOLD ACTIONS we are thankful our volunteers and community have taken throughout the year. We thought we could reflect together on all that we have accomplished this year and how every single one of us is important in this powerful community. A

Read More »