Australia’s University of New South Wales (UNSW) is trialling an education module for health professionals. The trial module treats chronic fatigue syndrome patients with graded exercise therapy and cognitive behaviour therapy (GET/CBT), despite the evidence showing these therapies have no benefit and may cause permanent harm.
If you object to this trial, sign the petition or write to the University’s President and Vice Chancellor urgently. The petition will be submitted to the UNSW Vice Chancellor, the Mason Foundation and the Minister for Health in 10 days, along with a letter explaining why they University should not be conducting research based on the PACE trial.
An Australian patient asked for the PACE trial data and the analysis of it revealed neither CBT nor GET significantly increase recovery rates at 52-week follow-up.
It poses an international risk, as UNSW plan to “disseminate the treatment to other centers nationally and internationally”, according to information the University provided to the National Health and Medical Research Council.
The trial registration says “despite GET and CBT being widely acknowledged as best-practice interventions for CFS, the great majority of patients in Australia are not receiving these appropriate evidence-based interventions. Recent studies have demonstrated that the reason for this documented gap between research and practice is largely due to practicing health professionals lacking the knowledge and skills to provide appropriate care. ” It does not specify which “recent studies” and it is not true that it is “widely acknowledged as best-practice”.
Australian and overseas patient organisations, CFS and ME medical experts and science journalists have all raised the alarm about the use of GET/CBT:
“There is no good evidence to support the use of graded exercise therapy or cognitive behaviour therapy and there is important emerging evidence on genetic and immune markers for the condition, so we ask the Department of Health not to waste precious research dollars on those studies”.
“Australia shouldn’t be funding research into totally inappropriate exercise regimes or therapy, these remedies are actually counter-productive and dangerous”.
“A significant number of patients had been given advice on exercise and activity management that was judged harmful with symptoms becoming worse or much worse and leading to relapse.”
“Anyone who suggests that this might be fixed by exercise therapy should probably be de-registered I think”.
Reading patients’ reasons for signing the petition shows the negative impact of the trial.
SBS: The implosion of a breakthrough study on chronic fatigue syndrome
World’s top ME and CFS scientists sign letter asking Lancet to reanalyse PACE trial data.
Previous response from UNSW’s ethics committee.
UNSW’s psychiatry department tests graded exercise on mild patients.
Australian government funding of UNSW.
How the UNSW chronic fatigue syndrome studies use ‘potentially harmful’ guidelines.
Paper: A preliminary analysis of ‘recovery’ from chronic fatigue syndrome in the PACE trial using individual participant data.
Petition: Stop graded exercise therapy trial at University of NSW
4 thoughts on “Australian university must not ignore evidence-based science”
Please reconsider this trial in light of the evidence that the PACE report is wrong. Exercise is damaging, not healing. It’s wonderful that patients should be offered CBT, but purely as a way to rebuild self esteem and assess the new reality of life with a difficult illness. You can’t talk patients out of the fact that they are suffering from an organic disease. Would this be done with cancer, Lupus, or Parkinson’s?
Stop it. First do no harm. Look at the past research Don’t experiment with children they are going to have a longer tougher road because of nonsense like this! Shame on you
UNSW how can you ignore the ground breaking research coming out of other universities in Australia, the USA and Norway???
Why are you supporting the dissemination of miss information to the medical profession?
Real objective studies using physiological measures are being ignored….
Your clinics don’t measure outcomes objectively, claims of statistical functional improvements are not VERIFIED by random controlled trials.
This illness is real and has underlying physical causes that are not well understood yet. Please don’t spend what little money there is on CFS research by trying to replicate a piece of work that has been absolutely ripped to pieces.
But don’t take my word for it, read what this Dr from Harvard Uni has to say:
Or you can read up on work that’s been ongoing at Stanford Uni:
Comments are closed.