Response to AHRQ's continued support of PACE

On February 3, 2016, a group of patient organizations and advocates (including #MEAction) sent a followup letter to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) further detailing concerns with the 2015 AHRQ Evidence Review and reiterating their request, originally made in November 2015, to reanalyze the conclusions of AHRQ’s Evidence Review in light of the long-known concerns with PACE and with the Oxford definition. #MEAction signed onto the original letter after running a poll which showed almost unanimous support from our members.

Background

In November 2015, a group of U.S. organizations sent a letter to the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) requesting a review of the concerns raised with PACE in a series of articles by journalist David Tuller. Based on these concerns and the call by the National Institute of Health (NIH) Pathways to Prevention report to retire the Oxford definition because it could “impair progress and cause harm”, the letter recommended the following steps as appropriate and necessary to protect patients:

  • The AHRQ revise its evidence review to reflect the issues with PACE and with Oxford studies in general;
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) remove findings based on PACE and other Oxford studies from current and planned medical education;
  • HHS use its leadership position to communicate these concerns to other medical education providers;
  • HHS call for The Lancet to seek an independent reanalysis of PACE.

The Agency Responses

In AHRQ’s response the authors of the evidence review noted that the review had already considered some of the concerns raised by Tuller and that the additional information would not change the review’s conclusions. Yet, the evidence review ranked PACE as a “Good” study with “undetected” reporting bias, a rating that is not consistent with the long-known concerns with PACE but one that could presumably influence conclusions. Further, AHRQ’s response did not address the concerns with using Oxford studies as the basis of recommendations of treatment benefits and harms for ME/CFS patients. The February 3, 2016 letter from patient organizations and advocates details these concerns and reiterates the request to reevaluate the evidence review conclusions.

CDC’s response, further clarified by a followup email, stated that the IOM and P2P “have placed the findings of the PACE trial in an appropriate context for moving the field forward.” They stated the need for research and that CDC would be conducting a collaborative initiative to prepare new medical education materials. However, CDC’s response did not address the question of whether findings and recommendations based on Oxford studies would be allowed in new medical education materials for this disease. The CDC has been asked to specifically respond to this question. That response will be shared when it is available.

HHS did not responded to the request to call on The Lancet to seek an independent review.

If you have not done so, please join in with us and sign this petition calling for AHRQ and CDC to act to protect patients.

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Email

2 thoughts on “Response to AHRQ's continued support of PACE”

  1. Hi there, Thank you for this article! It appears that three links to dropbox content are not working (?) – you may want to double-check: “a letter” “AHRQ’s response” and “CDC’s response”

    1. thanks! I am not sure why those links sometimes worked and sometimes didn’t. I uploaded the documents to #MEAction and changed the links– would you mind letting me know if they all work for you?

Comments are closed.

Latest News

blue rectangle image with the NIH logo in the top left hand corner. the words: NIH MECFS Research Roadmap Update Public comments open until March 8th appear in the middle of the image. the meaction logo is in the bottom right hand corner.

NIH ME/CFS Research Roadmap Update–Public Comment Period Now Open

The NIH ME/CFS Research Roadmap public comment period is open now with a deadline of March 8th.  #MEAction is a member of the ME/CFS Research Roadmap Working Group and for the past several months we have been advocating on behalf of this community within this group. Our Executive Director, Laurie Jones, served on the nervous

Read More »
a rectangle image with multiple small hearts in the corners. The words, Valentine's Day Interview with Jamison Hill and Book Promotion. The cover of the book is next to the words. The #MEAction logo at the bottom.

Valentine’s Day Interview with Jamison Hill & Book Promotion

We are excited to bring you a special Valentine’s Day promotion of Jamison Hill’s most recent book, Something’s Wrong with Micah.  #MEAction had the pleasure of having a Twitter chat with Jamison when his memoir When Force Meets Fate came out. We now get to bring this Q&A about his newest book to you. Jamison

Read More »
on a red sparkly rectangle image. The words "#MEAction's Volunteer Program Revamped!" are written in an arcade/game font. Sign-Up Today! The #MEAction logo in the bottom right corner

#MEAction’s Volunteer Program Revamped

Exciting news: #MEAction revamped our volunteer program for the new year! We are honored to have wonderful volunteers including people with ME, Long Covid, and other associated conditions as well as our caregivers, allies, and wider communities. Volunteering with #MEAction can and does make all the difference. We invite you to join our program! Our

Read More »
Scroll to Top