Meet The Scientist: Professor Anthony Komaroff

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

Anthony Komaroff, MD, is the distinguished Simcox-Clifford-Higby Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Senior Physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. He has published over 230 research articles and two books. From 1997-2015 he was editor in chief of the Harvard Health Publications Division of Harvard Medical School, the division responsible for disseminating all of the medical school’s health information for the general public. He has been publishing research papers on myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) since the late 1980’s, and currently serves on the National Institutes of Health’s advisory council for ME/CFS research.

Also, check out this twitter thread of Anthony Komaroff, MD, summarizing more than 30 talks at the NIH “Accelerating ME” conference.

Professor Komaroff took time out from his busy schedule to be interviewed for our Meet The Scientist blog.

How did you get involved with the field of ME research?

In the early 1980s I saw several patients in my internal medicine practice with what we now would call ME/CFS, and it was clear that virtually nothing was known about the illness. That intrigued me.

Can you tell us something about your own research into ME. 

I am an internal medicine physician and clinical epidemiologist. My work on ME/CFS, in collaboration with experts in various areas, has included: 1) studying how common the illness is; 2) studying how severely the illness affects a person’s ability to function; 3) understanding the underlying biological abnormalities in the brain, autonomic nervous system, immune system and energy metabolism; 4) studying whether the illness can sometimes be triggered by infectious agents.

The Sunday Times newspaper recently carried an article with the headline “Always fatigued, yet they never tire of claiming their malady is a virus’’, which peddled the well-worn myth that ME is all in the mind. Is this claim, that ME is a psychological/somatic illness, scientifically accurate? 

The U.S. National Academy of Sciences (through its Institute of Medicine) has summarized a scientific literature of over 9,000 published research reports. The reports document many underlying biological abnormalities in people with ME/CFS, and that the illness is not imaginary. Moreover, it is clear that some cases of the illness can be triggered by different kinds of infectious agents, including viruses.

There are over 17 million people internationally who suffer from ME. Yet minimal resources have been put into research for this debilitating neurological illness. Why do you think ME has consistently faced significant underinvestment compared to other neurological illnesses? 

One big problem has been that most researchers already have their own fields of special interest, and haven’t been interested in turning their attention to ME/CFS. However, I’m encouraged that the number of scientists all over the world who are studying this illness has grown greatly over the past 30 years.

Post Exertion Malaise (PEM) remains an important characteristic symptom of ME/CFS that helps distinguish it from other conditions yet it is poorly understood. Please could you explain what PEM is and the importance of developing an accurate assessment tool? 

Here I would refer you to the U.S. Institute of Medicine report that laid this out nicely.

How far away do you think we are from effective treatments for ME? 

It’s always hard to make such predictions. One problem is that it takes such a large investment for a pharmaceutical company to pay for the studies necessary to test whether a treatment is effective. As the underlying biology of the illness becomes clearer, I’m optimistic that useful treatments will follow.

In your opinion, what needs to be done by public health authorities to bring about better health outcomes for people suffering from ME? 

One of the greatest causes of suffering among people with ME/CFS is that some doctors, friends, family members, and employers wonder if the illness is imaginary, or fabricated. Public health authorities can help disseminate the scientific evidence that the illness has objective underlying biological abnormalities, involving the brain, autonomic nervous system, immune system and energy metabolism. They also can provide more support services for those who are homebound.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on google
Share on email

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

NHS England omits advice to apply clinical judgement re vaccine

It has come to light that a letter from NHS England and NHS Improvement to all vaccination centres and GPs in the UK has omitted advice that health professionals can and should apply their clinical judgement when placing people in group 6. Vaccination of people with underlying health conditions that put them at risk of

Read More »
Waiting for Superman Book on table

Waiting for Superman – UK Book Giveaway and Review

Do you want to win a free copy of Waiting for Superman? We have three copies to give away to people in the UK!  To enter, all you have to do is follow #MEAction UK on Instagram, like and comment on this post. The deadline is 9am (GMT) Monday 8th March! Win a copy! Thank

Read More »
#MEAction activists outside Scottish Parliament

Scottish Election! Ask your MSPs to support people with ME

If you live in Scotland, please join our campaign to ask your MSPs to pledge their support for people with ME. Email your MSPs The Holyrood elections are coming up on 6 May 2021 and we want to make sure that MSPs are aware of ME and the desperate need for support. There are more

Read More »

Help keep our work going

We rely on donations from people like you to keep fighting for equality for people with ME.


Get actions alerts and news direct to your inbox

You can choose what you want to be kept up to date on.

Scroll to Top