U.S. Healthcare Coding Revisions Enable Tracking of ME/CFS Cases

Since 2015, the 1-2.5 million Americans with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) have been effectively nonexistent, at least as far as US disease tracking systems are concerned. Americans don’t experience any morbidity (suffering, impairment) from ME/CFS. They can’t die with ME/CFS. Nobody develops ME/CFS following an acute COVID-19 infection – despite all the evidence that shows they can and do. And ME/CFS cases don’t show up in research using electronic health records. The reason? ME/CFS is effectively nonexistent simply because ME/CFS is not being coded in US health records. 

This coding problem is finally being fixed in the 2023 release of the ICD-10-CM, being implemented October 1, 2022. Going forward, Americans diagnosed with ME/CFS, including any new cases following COVID, will no longer be invisible.

The ICD-10-CM is the US version of the International Classification of Diseases used to track diseases globally. When the US implemented the ICD-10-CM in 2015, the term “chronic fatigue syndrome,” the term almost always used by US doctors for ME/CFS, was assigned the same ICD code as the symptom of “chronic fatigue, unspecified.” At the same time, the term “myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome,” the name adopted by US federal agencies and in clinical guidance, was never added to the ICD-10-CM. 

As a result, virtually all US cases of ME/CFS have been effectively lost in a bucket of unspecified chronic fatigue due to any cause. This impacts tracking of ME/CFS disease mortality and morbidity and assessment of its disease burden and healthcare utilization and cost. It impacts insurance billing and reimbursement. And it also impacts research using electronic health records, including plans by NIH and CDC to undertake such research to understand Long COVID and its sequelae. More information on the coding issue and its impact is available here

This is a uniquely American problem as only the US has reclassified CFS in its ICD-10-CM to be equivalent to the symptom of chronic fatigue, unspecified. The World Health Organization and other countries classify both CFS and ME together with postviral fatigue syndrome in the neurological chapter. 

To fix this coding problem in the ICD-10-CM, the term ME/CFS has been added and the term “postviral fatigue syndrome” expanded to “postviral and related fatigue syndromes” to account for non-viral infections and other causes. “Chronic fatigue syndrome” has been moved back to the neurological chapter and the term “systemic exertion intolerance disease” added because some US healthcare providers use this term. Importantly, a note has been added to also code post-COVID condition (U09.9) when ME/CFS is associated with COVID. The full set of ICD-10-CM changes for ME/CFS, CFS and postviral fatigue syndrome is summarized here

This update is the result of multiple proposals by the ME/CFS community since 2011, most recently in 2021 by seven ME/CFS organizations: #MEAction, Open Medicine Foundation, Solve ME/CFS Initiative, International Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Massachusetts ME/CFS & FM Association, Pandora Org and Minnesota ME/CFS Alliance. Their proposal to add the term ME/CFS and expand postviral fatigue syndrome is available here. The additional changes recommended by the National Centers for Health Statistics, responsible for ICD-10-CM, can be seen here and in the final updates here.

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Email

9 thoughts on “U.S. Healthcare Coding Revisions Enable Tracking of ME/CFS Cases”

  1. Thank you, thank you thank you. I’ll be printing out these revisions to present to my PCP once the NCHS clarifies the codes noted in the release/notification. Thank you again #MEAction!

  2. Stephanie Jorgensen

    This is amazing!! I feel it! Thank you, thank you for your tireless efforts on all of our behalfs!

  3. Leon Pogorelis

    Even something simple as telling the court why you are not able to serve on jury duty can be difficult to prove because doctors will not give you something in writing that with this condition you can’t think clearly or sit for long amounts of time.

    1. I had to do that. I suppose it “ helped” that I was irrationally terrified and seriously brain fogged that day (it was my first contact with the legal system since the final neural insert that sent me into full-blown ME). For whatever reason, the judge believed me and took me off the jury duty roster. Perhaps if you’re having a very foggy day?

  4. As a brit, this is too confusing for me. we have just ME and PVFS here although PVFS is now called CFS thanks to Lake Tahoe. It only needs to be ME and PVFS or ME and CFS though. The HOLMES definition of CFS is Lake Tahoe disease which is probably ME. It’s confusing right? Probably best to scrap CFS altogether then and call Lake Tahoe ME. Just my opinion

  5. My American GP, who is by all accounts an otherwise good doctor, told me recently that he has never heard of CFS/ME.
    My opinion is that we not only need coding, but an initiative to educate current doctors on even the basics of what this illness is. It’s incomprehensible that roughly 2 million Americans have an illness that current US doctors have not even heard of.

  6. Do #pwME need to request that their doctors use the new coding in their file? In other words, do we have to ask, or demand, that our doctors update our files with the new coding? Or is this something that doctors will do automatically?

  7. jessica marotta-porter

    This is AWESOME! It is about time. I’m so tired of hearing about people dyeing from ME/CFS and their medical records either not showing a ‘reason’ for the death (just a big unspecified mystery) or being attributed to something else, most likely caused by ME/CFS. Plus, I should hope this will give us more ‘legitimacy’ in the medical world (and world at large in time)

  8. I rarely get involved as its too exhausting even to read but I just have to congratulate all who are involved. I’m 82 and got sick when I was 45. It happened overnight. I could write a book but won’t. I firmly believe everything but ME should be recorded as what we all have until someone proves otherwise. I was very involved for a while in a support group and was lucky to have Dr. Lapp as our mentor. He became my ME specialist. The group disbanded. I miss it.

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Blue square image with starbursts in the corners. the words, submit long covid drug recommendations to recover -tlc! are in the middle of the image, surrounded by thin white lines. the meaction logo is at the top of the image.

Submit Long COVID Drug Recommendations to RECOVER-TLC!

Last month, RECOVER TLC met at NIH headquarters in Bethesda. The goal was to initiate a drug development strategy for Long COVID clinical trials. Now, RECOVER TLC has opened the RECOVER-TLC Intervention Information Request Form, where you can make suggestions about which drugs and other interventions to trial!  Anyone can submit a therapeutic for consideration

Read More »
A classroom of people watching a panel discussion.

The RECOVER-Treating Long COVID (RECOVER TLC) The Path Forward

The RECOVER-Treating Long COVID (RECOVER TLC) Kick-off Meeting was Sept 23-25 in person and over Zoom. I had the privilege of attending over Zoom and Jaime Seltzer, #MEAction’s Scientific Director, represented the needs of the ME community in person and as an invited member of a panel on clinical trial design. There were many speakers

Read More »
Scroll to Top