QMUL reject PACE FOI request from Ron Davis and colleagues

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), acting on behalf of the authors of the highly controversial PACE trial, has rejected a request made by a group of scientists for raw, anonymised data from the trial.
The group was led by world-famous geneticist Professor Ron Davis of Stanford University, whose son, Whitney Dafoe, is gravely ill with ME/CFS. Professor Davis was joined in his request by biostatistician Professor Bruce Levin and immunologist Professor Vincent Racaniello, both of Columbia University, and Dr. David Tuller, Lecturer in Public Health and Journalism at the University of  California, Berkeley.
The scientists had requested data that would allow them to conduct analyses that the PACE authors had themselves specified in the original study protocol but abandoned. The analyses were replaced by others with “thresholds on the primary outcomes that indicated worse health than the study’s own entry criteria.” The analyses have been widely criticised and are the subject of an 11,000-strong petition asking the journals that published them to retract them.
Professor Davis and his colleagues made the request under the Freedom of Infomation Act, and QMUL waited the maximum allowable 20 working days before responding. Professor Racaniello, publishing the rejection letter on his Virology Blog, quipped, “At least we’re not vexatious,” in an apparent reference to QMUL’s history of dismissing PACE data requests on those grounds. The rejection was, said Dr Tuller, “as we expected.”
The letter claims that the data are exempt from disclosure because patients in the trial were guaranteed confidentiality and because the data “form part of an ongoing programme of research”. But, QMUL noted, “the PACE PIs and their associated organisations are currently reviewing a data sharing policy.”
Professor Davis and his group have 40 working days to appeal the decision. Meanwhile, Professor James Coyne has said that PLOS One’s lawyers and the PACE authors’ lawyers are “squaring off” over his own request for data relating to a PACE paper published in the journal, and an Information Rights Tribunal is due to soon hear the case of a patient who was refused PACE data by QMUL.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on google
Google+
Share on email
Email

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

NHS England omits advice to apply clinical judgement re vaccine

It has come to light that a letter from NHS England and NHS Improvement to all vaccination centres and GPs in the UK has omitted advice that health professionals can and should apply their clinical judgement when placing people in group 6. Vaccination of people with underlying health conditions that put them at risk of

Read More »
Waiting for Superman Book on table

Waiting for Superman – UK Book Giveaway and Review

Do you want to win a free copy of Waiting for Superman? We have three copies to give away to people in the UK!  To enter, all you have to do is follow #MEAction UK on Instagram, like and comment on this post. The deadline is 9am (GMT) Monday 8th March! Win a copy! Thank

Read More »
#MEAction activists outside Scottish Parliament

Scottish Election! Ask your MSPs to support people with ME

If you live in Scotland, please join our campaign to ask your MSPs to pledge their support for people with ME. Email your MSPs The Holyrood elections are coming up on 6 May 2021 and we want to make sure that MSPs are aware of ME and the desperate need for support. There are more

Read More »

Help keep our work going

We rely on donations from people like you to keep fighting for equality for people with ME.

Donate

Get actions alerts and news direct to your inbox

You can choose what you want to be kept up to date on.

Subscribe
Scroll to Top