QMUL reject PACE FOI request from Ron Davis and colleagues

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), acting on behalf of the authors of the highly controversial PACE trial, has rejected a request made by a group of scientists for raw, anonymised data from the trial.
The group was led by world-famous geneticist Professor Ron Davis of Stanford University, whose son, Whitney Dafoe, is gravely ill with ME/CFS. Professor Davis was joined in his request by biostatistician Professor Bruce Levin and immunologist Professor Vincent Racaniello, both of Columbia University, and Dr. David Tuller, Lecturer in Public Health and Journalism at the University of  California, Berkeley.
The scientists had requested data that would allow them to conduct analyses that the PACE authors had themselves specified in the original study protocol but abandoned. The analyses were replaced by others with “thresholds on the primary outcomes that indicated worse health than the study’s own entry criteria.” The analyses have been widely criticised and are the subject of an 11,000-strong petition asking the journals that published them to retract them.
Professor Davis and his colleagues made the request under the Freedom of Infomation Act, and QMUL waited the maximum allowable 20 working days before responding. Professor Racaniello, publishing the rejection letter on his Virology Blog, quipped, “At least we’re not vexatious,” in an apparent reference to QMUL’s history of dismissing PACE data requests on those grounds. The rejection was, said Dr Tuller, “as we expected.”
The letter claims that the data are exempt from disclosure because patients in the trial were guaranteed confidentiality and because the data “form part of an ongoing programme of research”. But, QMUL noted, “the PACE PIs and their associated organisations are currently reviewing a data sharing policy.”
Professor Davis and his group have 40 working days to appeal the decision. Meanwhile, Professor James Coyne has said that PLOS One’s lawyers and the PACE authors’ lawyers are “squaring off” over his own request for data relating to a PACE paper published in the journal, and an Information Rights Tribunal is due to soon hear the case of a patient who was refused PACE data by QMUL.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on google
Google+
Share on email
Email

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

TWO WEEKS TO SEND IN YOUR RESEARCH IDEAS

Help prioritise ME/CFS research by filling in this survey A major UK project is looking for your input. They want to know what research you think should be funded in the future, and the deadline for adding your ideas is fast approaching. Your responses must be in by Monday 5th July 2021. Find out more

Read More »
#MEAction Hosts an Artist’s Salon During #MillionsMissing

#MEAction Hosts an Artist’s Salon During #MillionsMissing

Activism comes in many forms, and #MEAction recognizes the significant role that art can play, not only as healing and cathartic expression, but as a powerful tool to move hearts and drive change. The ME community is host to talented artists all over the world, and we wanted to celebrate their gifts by hosting a

Read More »

Help keep our work going

We rely on donations from people like you to keep fighting for equality for people with ME.

Donate

Get actions alerts and news direct to your inbox

You can choose what you want to be kept up to date on.

Subscribe
Scroll to Top