David Tuller Tears Apart PACE Trial

Health scientist and New York Times published journalist David Tuller today launched a damning critique upon the UK’s £5 million PACE trial in an article published on the popular Virology Blog.
The PACE trial was an open-label study of graded exercise therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome that used subjective measures as its main outcomes. It is the core justification for prescribing these therapies to ME patients around the world.
In his detailed article, Tuller challenges the PACE trial authors’ claims that the therapies led to recovery for some patients.
Tuller points out multiple changes to the original, approved study protocol, including the changing of all of the methods for assessing the primary study outcomes, and the relaxation of all of the criteria for recovery.
In what Tuller describes as a “bizarre paradox”, patients’ scores at baseline for physical function and fatigue could worsen and yet they would be considered “recovered” according to the new thresholds that replaced those specified in the study protcol.
The objective measures used in the trial, including a walking test, did not, Tuller says, support the authors’ claims concerning recovery, but the study authors dismissed these measures even though they themselves had designed them.
Critics of the trial have previously pointed out that PACE patients’ average walking test scores after therapy have been exceeded by patients listed for lung transplantation and by older patients with chronic heart failure.
In further criticism, Tuller reports that patients were not informed of the main investigators’ insurance-industry conflicts of interest in the trial, in violation of the study protocol and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Principal investigators Peter White, Trudie Chalder and Michael Sharpe, and Richard Horton, the editor of The Lancet where the PACE trial was published, did not grant interviews to Tuller.
However, a number of high-profile scientists spoke to him about the trial. “I’m shocked that The Lancet published it,” said leading geneticist Ronald Davis, of Stanford University. “The PACE study has so many flaws and there are so many questions you’d want to ask about it that I don’t understand how it got through any kind of peer review”.
Jonathan Edwards, world-famous for his work in rheumatoid arthritis at University College London, told Tuller, “It’s a mass of un-interpretability to me. Within the circle who are involved in this field, it seems there were a group who were prepared to all sing by the hymn sheet and agree that PACE was wonderful. But all the issues with the trial are extremely worrying, making interpretation of the clinical significance of the findings more or less impossible.”
University of California epidemiologist Arthur Reingold said to Tuller, “Under the circumstances, an independent review of the trial conducted by experts not involved in the design or conduct of the study would seem to be very much in order.”
Tuller credits patients for much of the information and scientific insight that led to his critique.
The second part of his analysis will appear on Virology Blog tomorrow. (You can read our summary of the entire four part series here: “Investigative journalist debunks PACE trial“)

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Email

4 thoughts on “David Tuller Tears Apart PACE Trial”

  1. This powerful story, published over three days, will definitely get some traction on Twitter. I have been adding @Lancet to include the journal, and suggest using #retractPACE. Maybe others have different ideas about how to get the message across. Just putting it out there.
    The XMRV paper could have been just not replicated, but was retracted, unnecessarily. I believe PACE has some much worse harm to scientific understanding of this disease, and needs to be robustly refuted and then retracted so it can’t be used against us anymore. I’m sure others have more knowledge about how to pursue and support that process.

  2. I am smiling, smiling. Finally the mind-medics are about to receive their comeuppance. Psychology and Psychiatry are not real sciences [paraphrasing Sheldon]. The mind is bathed in physicality. Along with Prof Newton’s team finding the enzyme that I may be short of, [I have been telling people for years that I am an enzyme short of the full reaction], this has been such a good day that I am going to have a little lie down now. Don’t laugh too hard, you lot, PACE yourselves hahaha – not.

  3. Thank you David Tuller!
    An independent investigation is so desperately needed and it is so refreshing to hear numerous experts point out the blatant manipulation of data and laughability that the PACE trial is.
    I hope that the UK will start to catch up to the US in terms of booting out the psychiatric view once and for all.

Comments are closed.

Latest News

DHSC released a new progress Report

DHSC has released an update on the progress of the work underway to support the development of a Delivery Plan on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue. This is dated from December 2022.You can read the full report using the link below: DHSC Information Bulletin Dec 22 FINAL MECFS updated

Read More »
Gold fireworks lighting up over a black background. The words, TOP HITS 2022 is in the center in white lettering. the words: #MEAction accomplished a lot last year is undernether with the #MEAction logo

Let’s Look at #MEAction’s Top Hits from 2022

As we ring in the new year, it is a wonderful time to reflect on how much #MEAction accomplished in a very busy and exciting 2022! There are so many wins to share, so we decided to narrow down the list to our TOP HITS! ——————- #MILLIONSMISSING 2022: * Bringing together the powerful Virtual #MillionsMissing

Read More »
A photo from Millions Missing Scotland of a group of 20 protestors outside the Scottish Parliament. They’re looking serious and holding signs that say Millions Missing, and a pledge signed by MSPs. Many are wearing red ME Action t-shirts. A yellow icon of a person is overlaid next to them with an arrow pointing to it and the words ‘Could it be your MSP?’ A red banner along the bottom says ‘Share your story and ask your MSPs to stand up for people with ME.’

Ask your MSPs to stand up for people with ME

Sue Webber MSP’s motion about ME will be debated in the Scottish Parliament on Thursday 2nd February – and your MSPs should be there! The motion calls on the Scottish Parliament to recognise the outcomes and recommendations of the stakeholder report on ME, including education of healthcare professionals and development of specialist services. We’re pleased

Read More »

Help keep our work going

We rely on donations from people like you to keep fighting for equality for people with ME.

Donate

Get actions alerts and news direct to your inbox

You can choose what you want to be kept up to date on.

Subscribe
Scroll to Top