#MEAction UK response to NICE 2017

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

#MEAction UK response to NICE 2017
Background information
UK clinical guidelines are written by a body called the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The current guidelines were last revised in 2007 and contain recommendations that people with ME consider unsuitable and potentially harmful. These guidelines also impact how ME is perceived in other countries, so it is not an isolated UK problem.
It is clear to us that the 2007 guidelines require an update, so we were dismayed to hear that NICE had looked at the evidence and is inclined to think no update is required. In July 2017 stakeholder organisations were given two weeks to respond to the proposal not to update (link https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg53/documents/surveillance-review-proposal). Two weeks to agree and write an effective argument, at a time when those with milder ME were flying off on holiday. For us, as a grassroots network of people with ME, this timeframe seemed like an almost insurmountable barrier to full participation.
However, with a team of about fifteen people we rallied together to team write. We got advice on wording from experts and references from the wider online community. We busied ourselves with writing and commenting (up to the limit of how busy a group of mostly people with ME can be!). What has resulted from our team effort is an unexpectedly comprehensive explanation of our reasons for disagreeing with the no update proposal. We hope it will also be useful for you all as a general document about the state of play for ME UK politics and research in 2017.
This is our response to NICE: PDF / HTML

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on google
Google+
Share on email
Email

2 thoughts on “#MEAction UK response to NICE 2017”

  1. Well done!!! Makes me proud to think work of this quality was produced in 2 weeks by people with little energy and brain fog…..You did a great job and I do hope they listen.

  2. I have just read through your response to NICE. It is so clear concise and yes comprehensive. I congratulate you all! I would also like to send my thanks and appreciation to everyone who contributed to this excellent work.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Is NIH blowing another opportunity to advance ME/CFS research?

Be sure to attend the telebriefing by the Trans-NIH ME/CFS Working Group this Friday (10/22) at 3PM ET. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has many questions to answer about its lack of tangible progress or strategic acceleration of medical research for people with ME. Read Our Questions for NIH ME/CFS research opportunity being missed

Read More »

Stanford study enrolling now

Who: Ron Davis’s lab at Stanford University is conducting a functional microbiome study in collaboration with Harvard University and Vassar College. They are looking for severely Ill, primarily bed-bound patients within the United States to participate. What: Participants will be asked to provide a one-time fecal swab which can be collected at home and sent

Read More »

“The treatment of ME has been Dickensian” – NICE’s roundtable on the ME/CFS guideline

After NICE’s roundtable, Janet Sylvester tells us: “I felt this was a positive meeting. There were large areas of agreement from all attendees, including all acknowledging the terrible experiences people with ME have had to endure. Together, the representatives from ME patient organisations were able to strongly get across the reality for people living with ME. I’m optimistic the guidelines will be published.”

Read More »

Help keep our work going

We rely on donations from people like you to keep fighting for equality for people with ME.

Donate

Get actions alerts and news direct to your inbox

You can choose what you want to be kept up to date on.

Subscribe
Scroll to Top