Australian scientists publish study showing potential biomarker for ME

graph showing differences in activin

Scientists in Canberra and Melbourne have just published a study claiming to have found that activin B is a biomarker for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Participants with ME/CFS were recruited using the Canadian Consensus Criteria.

The research will need to be validated through further studies. The next step is a longitudinal study, which has already begun, and will examine 80 participants for an initial consultation, then at six and 12 months.

“Elevated activin B levels together with normal activin A levels identified patients with the diagnostic symptoms of CFS/ME, thus providing a novel serum based test.”

The test is patented and only specialised labs would be able to do the test in the short-term while it is being validated. Hopefully, eventually the assay can be adapted to an immunoassay platform used routinely in pathology labs, when it has been validated in different populations and ethnicities, according to the paper’s lead author, Dr Brett Lidbury of the Australian National University. The test was patented by Paranta Bioscience.

The study, “Activin B is a novel biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) diagnosis: a cross sectional study,” was published in The Journal of Translational Medicine.  Dr Lidbury was featured in ‘Meet the Researchers‘ last year and nominated as ACT’s Scientist of the Year in 2016.

 

Graph: Mean serum concentrations of a activin A, b activin B and c follistatin levels in study participants diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME), compared to a study control group comprising healthy participants (study controls). d Ratio of activin B to follistatin levels (ActB:FST). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Why study activin?

Dr Lidbury said it was serendipity that led them to look at activin.

“A chance encounter, via Christine Hunter, with Prof David de Kretser of Monash Uni and the Hudson Institute in Clayton, Victoria, led us to examine activin,” he said.

The study explained the activin family is involved in the control of inflammation and muscle mass.

“The activins have multiple physiological roles and capture the diverse array of symptoms experienced by CFS/ME patients.”

Hedger and de Kretser describe activins as “regulators of cell development and function, including cells of the myeloid and lymphoid lineages. Clinical and animal studies have shown that activin levels increase in both acute and chronic inflammation, and are frequently indicators of disease severity. Moreover, inhibition of activin action can reduce inflammation, damage, fibrosis and morbidity/mortality in various disease models.”

De Kretser’s study showed that in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with acute respiratory distress, survival of up to 12-months post ICU can be predicted by the measurement of activin A and B levels during the first 5 days in ICU.

The paper states it “may be a causal relationship, since increased activin A and activin B levels can induce a loss of muscle mass”.

“In addition to immune dysregulation, the loss of muscle mass suggests that the activins are potentially involved in the pathogenesis of CFS/ME, given the prominence of muscle weakness and pain as diagnostic criteria across the various case definitions. Activin B levels do not change with respect to age, sex, BMI, ethnicity, smoking, allergies or type of medication and, to date, activin B levels have not been reported to be elevated or reduced in other diseases.”

The study noted that other biomarkers exist but are difficult to collect or have other challenges. For example, interleukin 10 (IL-10) which requires spinal fluid samples.

“Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) likewise has been mentioned as a significant marker. [However it needs] special blood collection methods and the removal of platelets prior to assay.”

Trial participants

The scientists studied 40 females and five males, aged 19–66 years with a length of illness from two to 40 years, who met the Canadian Consensus Criteria. They were recruited from Melbourne’s CFS Discovery Clinic. There were 13 female and four male healthy controls, who were not a relative of or lived with a patient.

Blood samples were collected from people after the 20-minute standing test and the concentrations of activin A, activin B and follistatin were measured in the serum isolated from these samples.

Data sharing

Dr Lidbury said the big thing is to validate the research.

“I hope that other labs around the world will have a look at the data, time will tell.”

Next step

The next step is a longitudinal study, which has already begun. The study will examine 80 participants meeting the criteria as well as a control group and a fatigued (but not meeting the CCC) group. The scientists are currently recruiting controls.

“As we speak, we are undertaking a study generously funded by the Mason Foundation which will look deeper to validate and firm up our initial observations,” said Dr Lidbury. “It is a longitudinal study with patients visiting for an initial consultation, then at six and 12 months after.”

The study states:

“It is estimated that around 0.4% of people worldwide suffer from CFS/ME… With the majority of affected patients not receiving the correct diagnosis, and therefore never receiving the proper medical care for their illness, there is a pressing need for a diagnostic biomarker to assist these patients.”

This article first appeared in ME Australia.


Categories: All News, Australia, Featured news

Support our work!

Did you find this content useful?
Help us keep going and keep growing. Make a recurring donation today.

Most people don't take the time to donate but if every visitor pledged just $1 per month on a recurring basis, we could fully fund #MEAction.


2 comments on “Australian scientists publish study showing potential biomarker for ME
  1. NexusOwl says:

    This is a small study with interest conflicts. You can read it in the declarations.

    We should not raise hopes with this. The tittle is not appropiate in my opinion. There are already plenty of other biomarkers to be researched that have much more background than this.

  2. Grant says:

    All research is welcome for suffers it gives us a glimpse of hope that we will finally get a treatment or a cure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Menu